Folding.LAR.Systems Folding.LAR.Systems Folding.LAR.Systems Folding.LAR.Systems
CPU section CPU tools and references
  1. CPU PPD
  2. Brands
  3. Intel
  4. CPU Folding@Home Profile

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v4 @ 2.20GHz
FOLDING@HOME PPD PERFORMANCE

CPU profile

Performance snapshot

Current output, per-thread efficiency, ranks, sample depth, and data freshness.

CPU family Intel / 44 logical processors
New / volatile
Most recent sample Jun 11, 2023 Most recent update seen for this CPU profile.
PPD-PLP average
10,231
Per logical processor
Estimated total PPD
450,164
All logical processors enabled
Logical processors
44
Available to the CPU fold slot
Data samples
453
Recorded CPU work units
Overall rank
#64
795 CPUs tracked
Brand rank
#15
564 Intel CPUs
Planning guidance and number variabilityOpen guide
Reading the averages

Why your PPD may differ

PPD is a guide, not a fixed result. Daily output changes with the work-unit mix, including project, points, atom count, and deadline, as well as system conditions such as OS, drivers, clocks, thermals, and power limits.

CPU allocation planning

CPU allocation at a glance

Use the estimate range, full-chip result, and processor ceiling to orient your setup, then compare allocations in the table.

View allocation table
How to read this

The logical-processor table below provides the detailed split guidance.

  • Leave enough CPU headroom for any GPUs folding on the same machine.
  • Compare split strategies in the allocation table instead of treating the full-chip estimate as a universal recommendation.
Current estimate range
10,231 to 450,164 PPD
Best full-chip estimate
450,164 PPD
Allocation ceiling
44 logical processors available

CPU PPD ESTIMATES BY LOGICAL PROCESSORS USED BETA

The following data for the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v4 @ 2.20GHz is estimated using the average PPD for each logical CPU processor, multiplied by different counts of those logical processors.

PPD data for CPUs is presented this way because folders can optimize their setup by folding on any number of the available logical processors on a project work unit.

The suggested number of logical processors for best results depends on how many GPUs are also folding, so enough CPU bandwidth remains available for GPU folding.

The maximum number of logical processors available on a CPU should only be used on a system dedicated solely to CPU folding with very little other overhead.

CPU Folding
Usage Percentage		Logical Procs
Enabled		AVG PPD
Estimated		WUs Day
Average		WU Time
Average		CPU & GPU Folding
LC MAX Suggested
100.0%
44450,1642.69 hrs 12 mins
97.7%
43439,9332.69 hrs 25 mins1 GPUs
95.5%
42429,7022.59 hrs 38 mins2 GPUs
93.2%
41419,4712.49 hrs 52 mins3 GPUs
90.9%
40409,2402.410 hrs 7 mins4 GPUs
88.6%
39399,0092.310 hrs 22 mins5 GPUs
86.4%
38388,7782.310 hrs 39 mins6 GPUs
84.1%
37378,5472.210 hrs 56 mins7 GPUs
81.8%
36368,3162.111 hrs 14 mins8 GPUs
79.5%
35358,0852.111 hrs 34 mins
77.3%
34347,8542.011 hrs 54 mins
75.0%
33337,6232.012 hrs 16 mins
72.7%
32327,3921.912 hrs 39 mins
70.5%
31317,1611.813 hrs 3 mins
68.2%
30306,9301.813 hrs 29 mins
65.9%
29296,6991.713 hrs 57 mins
63.6%
28286,4681.714 hrs 27 mins
61.4%
27276,2371.614 hrs 59 mins
59.1%
26266,0061.515 hrs 34 mins
56.8%
25255,7751.516 hrs 11 mins
54.5%
24245,5441.416 hrs 51 mins
52.3%
23235,3131.417 hrs 35 mins
50.0%
22225,0821.318 hrs 23 mins
47.7%
21214,8511.219 hrs 16 mins
45.5%
20204,6201.220 hrs 14 mins
43.2%
19194,3891.121 hrs 18 mins
40.9%
18184,1581.122 hrs 29 mins
38.6%
17173,9271.023 hrs 48 mins
36.4%
16163,6960.925 hrs 17 mins
34.1%
15153,4650.926 hrs 58 mins
31.8%
14143,2340.828 hrs 54 mins
29.5%
13133,0030.831 hrs 7 mins
27.3%
12122,7720.733 hrs 43 mins
25.0%
11112,5410.736 hrs 47 mins
22.7%
10102,3100.640 hrs 27 mins
20.5%
992,0790.544 hrs 57 mins
18.2%
881,8480.550 hrs 34 mins
15.9%
771,6170.457 hrs 48 mins
13.6%
661,3860.467 hrs 26 mins
11.4%
551,1550.380 hrs 55 mins
9.1%
440,9240.2101 hrs 8 mins
6.8%
330,6930.2134 hrs 51 mins
4.5%
220,4620.1202 hrs 17 mins
2.3%
110,2310.1404 hrs 34 mins

ACTIVE CPU RESEARCH PROJECTS BETA

The following data is the average PPD values for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v4 @ 2.20GHz project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.

PPD-PLP
Rank		Project
ID		Cause
Research		PPD-PLP
AVG PPD per 1 LP		ALL LP-PPD
Estimated @ 44 LP		PPD RANK %
Of Best PPD
119412cancer12,748560,912
100.0%
218810cancer12,321542,124
96.7%
319421cancer11,612510,928
91.1%
412423influenza11,535507,540
90.5%
512412influenza11,259495,396
88.3%
616978cancer10,971482,724
86.1%
716977cancer10,960482,240
86.0%
812414influenza10,854477,576
85.1%
912404influenza10,721471,724
84.1%
1018806cancer10,605466,620
83.2%
1112422influenza10,202448,888
80.0%
1218427cancer9,879434,676
77.5%
1312409influenza9,577421,388
75.1%
1412418influenza8,985395,340
70.5%
1518493cancer8,680381,920
68.1%
1618491cancer8,324366,256
65.3%
1712408influenza8,316365,904
65.2%
1818490cancer8,193360,492
64.3%
1918492cancer8,042353,848
63.1%
2012401influenza7,889347,116
61.9%
2112419influenza6,919304,436
54.3%
Track this hardware live

Profile your Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v4 @ 2.20GHz in our V8 Web Client

Launch the LAR.SYSTEMS V8 Web Client to monitor live work-unit activity, compare your machine with community benchmarks, and contribute real samples that keep public rankings and hardware insights current for the Folding@Home community.

Sample Folder Team Platform Seen
Most recent WU sample Anonymous Folder Team not recorded Windows CPU 3 years ago
First seen Anonymous Folder Team not recorded Windows CPU 3 years ago
Preview of the Folding@Home V8 web client showing active work units, current PPD comparisons, and live GPU and CPU statistics.
Launch V8 Web Client

Nearby CPU profiles

Compare the closest CPUs in the overall rankings.