Quadro P6000
FOLDING@HOME PPD PERFORMANCE
Performance snapshot
Current averages, ranks, sample depth, and data freshness.
- All-OS average
- 1,967,150
- Average PPD from submitted samples
- Linux average
- Not enough data
- Linux-only samples
- Windows average
- 1,967,150
- Windows-only samples
- Work unit samples
- 42
- All-time profile volume
- Overall rank
- #116
- 441 GPUs tracked
- Brand rank
- #98
- 294 Nvidia GPUs
Folding Statistics GP102GL [Quadro P6000] - Nvidia
| DATA SAMPLES INFO Filter applied, PPD samples all time |
AVERAGE FOLDING PERFORMANCE Based on ALL available PPD samples by filter |
WORK UNIT PPD RECORDS All Time |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS FILTER | SAMPLES | PPD | WU Per 24hrs | Time Per WU | Points Per WU | BEST PPD | WORST PPD |
| All OS AVG | 42 | 1,967,150 | 36.69 | 0 hrs 39 mins | 53,621 | 3,242,080 | 896,864 |
| Windows | 42 | 1,967,150 | 36.69 | 0 hrs 39 mins | 53,621 | 3,242,080 | 896,864 |
Profile your Quadro P6000 in our V8 Web Client
Launch the LAR.SYSTEMS V8 Web Client to monitor live work-unit activity, compare your machine with community benchmarks, and contribute real samples that keep public rankings and hardware insights current for the Folding@Home community.
| Sample | Folder | Team | Platform | Seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most recent WU sample | MLyons | Custom PC & bit-tech | Windows GPU | 1 year ago |
| First seen | MLyons | Custom PC & bit-tech | Windows GPU | 1 year ago |
12-week performance at a glance
Use the range, net change, and latest average as a quick signal—not a final judgment on the GPU.
How to read this
- Weekly movement can reflect project mix, available work units, drivers, or operating systems rather than a lasting hardware change.
- Use the detailed chart to compare operating systems and work-unit availability across the full period.
- Latest weekly average
- Not enough data
Recent Work Unit Performance - Quadro P6000
Average PPD is impacted by the types of research work units being done as they return different amounts of points and take different amounts of time.
The following shows the work unit allocation of research causes to better understand changes in PPD over time for the Quadro P6000.
Data is provided in legacy mode until new work units are folded using our web client.
Recent Work Unit Performance Clusters - Quadro P6000
The following visualization illustrates the PPD / Credit allocation of work units across different research causes, providing insight into how PPD varies by work unit PPD samples for the Quadro P6000.
This analysis helps better understand the relationship between research causes and PPD/Credit, highlighting any performance trends as clusters or anomalies as outliers.
Highest sampled PPD
| PPD Rank | Project ID | Cause Research | PPD Average | Points WU Average | WUs Day Average | WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12703 | cancer | 2,231,006 | 69,961 | 31.89 | 0 hrs 45 mins |
| 2 | 18236 | Force-Field-Protein-Dynamics | 2,143,388 | 42,450 | 50.49 | 0 hrs 29 mins |
| 3 | 18244 | Molecular-Dynamics-Force-Fields | 2,120,821 | 71,800 | 29.54 | 0 hrs 49 mins |
| 4 | 18242 | Force-Field-Protein-Simulation | 2,040,917 | 65,000 | 31.40 | 0 hrs 46 mins |
| 5 | 18243 | Force-Field-Protein-Simulation | 1,788,900 | 39,000 | 45.87 | 0 hrs 31 mins |
Lowest sampled PPD
| PPD Rank | Project ID | Cause Research | PPD Average | Points WU Average | WUs Day Average | WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18243 | Force-Field-Protein-Simulation | 1,788,900 | 39,000 | 45.87 | 0 hrs 31 mins |
| 2 | 18242 | Force-Field-Protein-Simulation | 2,040,917 | 65,000 | 31.40 | 0 hrs 46 mins |
| 3 | 18244 | Molecular-Dynamics-Force-Fields | 2,120,821 | 71,800 | 29.54 | 0 hrs 49 mins |
| 4 | 18236 | Force-Field-Protein-Dynamics | 2,143,388 | 42,450 | 50.49 | 0 hrs 29 mins |
| 5 | 12703 | cancer | 2,231,006 | 69,961 | 31.89 | 0 hrs 45 mins |