GPU section GPU tools and references

R9 Fury X/NANO
FOLDING@HOME PPD PERFORMANCE

GPU profile

Performance snapshot

Current averages, ranks, sample depth, and data freshness.

Folding@Home identifier Fiji XT [R9 Fury X/NANO]
High confidence
Most recent sample Aug 2, 2026 Most recent update seen for this GPU profile.
All-OS average
648,500
Average PPD from submitted samples
Linux average
Not enough data
Linux-only samples
Windows average
648,500
Windows-only samples
Work unit samples
28,621
All-time profile volume
Overall rank
#218
441 GPUs tracked
Brand rank
#45
133 AMD GPUs
Sampled performance breakdown

Folding Statistics Fiji XT [R9 Fury X/NANO] - AMD

DATA SAMPLES INFO
Filter applied, PPD samples all time
AVERAGE FOLDING PERFORMANCE
Based on ALL available PPD samples by filter
WORK UNIT PPD RECORDS
All Time
OS FILTER SAMPLES PPD WU Per 24hrs Time Per WU Points Per WU BEST PPD WORST PPD
All OS AVG 28,621 648,500 3.40 7 hrs 3 mins 190,683 228,970,987 4,296
Windows 28,621 648,500 3.40 7 hrs 3 mins 190,683 228,970,987 4,296
Track this hardware live

Profile your R9 Fury X/NANO in our V8 Web Client

Launch the LAR.SYSTEMS V8 Web Client to monitor live work-unit activity, compare your machine with community benchmarks, and contribute real samples that keep public rankings and hardware insights current for the Folding@Home community.

First and most recent work-unit sample contributors
Sample Folder Team Platform Seen
Most recent WU sample NetoriusNick LinusTechTips_Team Windows GPU 3 months ago
First seen NetoriusNick LinusTechTips_Team Windows GPU Not recorded
Recent GPU performance

12-week performance at a glance

Use the range, net change, and latest average as a quick signal—not a final judgment on the GPU.

View detailed chart
How to read this
  • Weekly movement can reflect project mix, available work units, drivers, or operating systems rather than a lasting hardware change.
  • Use the detailed chart to compare operating systems and work-unit availability across the full period.
Latest weekly average
Not enough data

Recent Work Unit Performance - R9 Fury X/NANO

Average PPD is impacted by the types of research work units being done as they return different amounts of points and take different amounts of time.

The following shows the work unit allocation of research causes to better understand changes in PPD over time for the R9 Fury X/NANO.

No work unit data recorded for the R9 Fury X/NANO in the past 12 weeks.

Data is provided in legacy mode until new work units are folded using our web client.

Recent Work Unit Performance Clusters - R9 Fury X/NANO

The following visualization illustrates the PPD / Credit allocation of work units across different research causes, providing insight into how PPD varies by work unit PPD samples for the R9 Fury X/NANO.

This analysis helps better understand the relationship between research causes and PPD/Credit, highlighting any performance trends as clusters or anomalies as outliers.

Project work-unit sample cluster chart.
Power and cost planning

R9 Fury X/NANO kWh POWER CONSUMPTION & COST

Power consumption information for the R9 Fury X/NANO is based on an average wattage taken from vendor information for the lowest and highest power draws for the GPU under Folding@Home compute loads.

Wattage information is only for the GPU and does not include the host computer's power usage.

$ / kWh

Default estimates are rendered at $0.10 per kWh. Your saved browser rate will update the cost columns across GPU profile pages.

Current GPU power consumption snapshot

GPU Power Draw
Watts - TDP
Daily Power Usage
kWh
Points per
kWh
Daily Cost at $0.10
per kWh
Power Cost
per 1m Points
275 W 6.60 kWh 76,401 $0.66 $1.309

R9 Fury X/NANO COMPUTE VS kWH USAGE DAY, MONTH, WEEK & YEAR

Folding@Home compute projections for the R9 Fury X/NANO can be used to help inform long-term point goals and related costs based on 24/7 usage.

Duration Nickname Points
Average
Work Units
Average
Power Usage
kWh
Power Cost
at $0.10 per kWh
Day PPD 504,247 7.74 6.60 kWh $0.66
Week PPW 3,529,729 54.21 46.20 kWh $4.62
Month PPM 15,337,512 235.55 200.75 kWh $20.08
Year PPY 184,050,155 2826.54 2409.00 kWh $240.90
Reading the averages

Why your PPD may differ

PPD is a guide, not a fixed result. Daily output changes with the work-unit mix, including project, points, atom count, and deadline, as well as system conditions such as OS, drivers, clocks, thermals, and power limits.

Compare the five highest and lowest sampled project averages for R9 Fury X/NANO using community samples collected through the LAR.SYSTEMS V8 Web Client.

Highest sampled PPD

PPD
Rank
Project
ID
Cause
Research
PPD
Average
Points WU
Average
WUs Day
Average
WU Time
Average
117639cancer1,139,303377,0683.027 hrs 57 mins
218500parkinsons1,138,613294,7553.866 hrs 13 mins
317116Core22-Benchmarking1,019,17210,146100.450 hrs 14 mins
412700cancer931,57455,57816.761 hrs 26 mins
512424alzheimers907,260144,7056.273 hrs 50 mins

Lowest sampled PPD

PPD
Rank
Project
ID
Cause
Research
PPD
Average
Points WU
Average
WUs Day
Average
WU Time
Average
117651Protein-Dynamics-Dataset255,2223,85066.290 hrs 22 mins
217656GPU-Core-Test293,3853,85076.200 hrs 19 mins
319600Protein-Dynamics-Modeling298,60435,2418.472 hrs 50 mins
412459influenza340,45562,7425.434 hrs 25 mins
512122Reflectin-Peptide-Structure347,70667,5005.154 hrs 40 mins