PROJECT #18451 RESEARCH FOR CANCER
FOLDING PERFORMANCE PROFILE
PROJECT SUMMARY
The function of a protein depends on its native shape, or fold.
Deciphering the sequence-dependent process by which proteins reach their folded state has been the goal of much experimental and computational work, and the inspiration for the e Folding@home project.
Small “fast folding” mini-proteins, such as the protein G B1 domain (GB1) and hpin1 WW domain, have been studied extensively both experimentally and through simulation, producing a wealth of data on wild-type protein function, and much insight on how mutations affect the folding reaction.
In 2022, the Voelz lab published a study on the folding reaction of a transcription factor, FOXO1, in which a simple hydrophobic transfer model was used to accurately predict mutational effects from models derived from massively parallel Folding@home simulations (Novack et al.).
We found that this model made more accurate predictions than other state of the art methods of mutational analysis.
We hypothesize that this is because our simulations have more accurate descriptions of the unfolded ensemble of a protein than other methods, highlighting the importance of adequately describing the unfolded state of a protein in determining mutational effects on folding reaction.
In these projects, we aim to validate this hypothesis on the well studied miniproteins GB1 and hpin1 WW domain, as well as the MeCP2 protein.
MeCP2 is a protein that binds methylated DNA and is found in high levels in nerve cells.
the main disease associated with mutations of MeCP2 is Rett syndrome, a neurological disorder that severely impairs people’s ability to speak, walk, eat, and breathe.
The gene lives on X chromosomes, thus for people with an XY chromosomal configuration (lacking a complimentary natively functioning gene), this disease can be fatal within the first 2 years due to encephalopathy.
There are at least 4668 mutational variants of MeCP2 identified, with 1171 being in the only structured region of the protein, the MBD.
Stability effects of mutation in MeCP2 have been investigated both experimentally and computationally, which makes it a promising test case for both validation of hydrophobic transfer as a model of mutation effects, as well as an opportunity to gain atomic insight that can elucidate new avenues for therapeutics targeting MeCP2..
PROJECT INFO
Manager(s): Dylan Novack
Institution: Temple University
Project URL: http://voelzlab.org
PROJECT WORK UNIT SUMMARY
Atoms: 40,908
Core: 0x22
Status: Public
PROJECT FOLDING PPD AVERAGES BY GPU
PPDDB data as of Saturday, 28 January 2023 00:14:36
Rank Project |
Model Name Folding@Home Identifier |
Make Brand |
GPU Model |
PPD Average |
Points WU Average |
WUs Day Average |
WU Time Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GeForce RTX 2060 Super TU106 [GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER] |
Nvidia | TU106 | 1,826,182 | 122,475 | 14.91 | 2 hrs 37 mins |
2 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GP102 [GeForce GTX 1080 Ti] 11380 |
Nvidia | GP102 | 1,696,010 | 118,772 | 14.28 | 2 hrs 41 mins |
3 | GeForce RTX 2070 Rev. A TU106 [GeForce RTX 2070 Rev. A] |
Nvidia | TU106 | 1,539,604 | 97,886 | 15.73 | 2 hrs 32 mins |
4 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile / Max-Q GA106M [GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile / Max-Q] |
Nvidia | GA106M | 1,306,780 | 105,431 | 12.39 | 2 hrs 56 mins |
5 | GeForce RTX 2070 TU106 [GeForce RTX 2070] |
Nvidia | TU106 | 1,261,915 | 97,942 | 12.88 | 2 hrs 52 mins |
6 | GeForce GTX 1080 GP104 [GeForce GTX 1080] 8873 |
Nvidia | GP104 | 1,206,956 | 105,946 | 11.39 | 2 hrs 6 mins |
7 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti TU116 [GeForce GTX 1660 Ti] |
Nvidia | TU116 | 1,206,404 | 106,409 | 11.34 | 2 hrs 7 mins |
8 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti GM200 [GeForce GTX 980 Ti] 5632 |
Nvidia | GM200 | 1,097,286 | 103,734 | 10.58 | 2 hrs 16 mins |
9 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER TU116 [GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER] |
Nvidia | TU116 | 1,075,156 | 101,982 | 10.54 | 2 hrs 17 mins |
10 | Tesla M40 GM200GL [Tesla M40] 6844 |
Nvidia | GM200GL | 1,018,418 | 100,598 | 10.12 | 2 hrs 22 mins |
11 | GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 [GeForce RTX 2060] |
Nvidia | TU104 | 989,191 | 100,296 | 9.86 | 2 hrs 26 mins |
12 | GeForce GTX 1070 GP104 [GeForce GTX 1070] 6463 |
Nvidia | GP104 | 944,063 | 98,252 | 9.61 | 2 hrs 30 mins |
13 | Tesla P4 GP104GL [Tesla P4] 5704 |
Nvidia | GP104GL | 922,743 | 97,332 | 9.48 | 3 hrs 32 mins |
14 | GeForce GTX 1660 TU116 [GeForce GTX 1660] |
Nvidia | TU116 | 881,600 | 96,056 | 9.18 | 3 hrs 37 mins |
15 | GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] 4372 |
Nvidia | GP106 | 762,480 | 91,738 | 8.31 | 3 hrs 53 mins |
16 | Tesla P100 16GB GP100GL [Tesla P100 16GB] 9340 |
Nvidia | GP100GL | 686,150 | 78,405 | 8.75 | 3 hrs 45 mins |
17 | GeForce GTX 980 GM204 [GeForce GTX 980] 4612 |
Nvidia | GM204 | 672,498 | 87,567 | 7.68 | 3 hrs 8 mins |
18 | GeForce GTX 970 GM204 [GeForce GTX 970] 3494 |
Nvidia | GM204 | 541,453 | 81,123 | 6.67 | 4 hrs 36 mins |
19 | GeForce GTX 1650 TU117 [GeForce GTX 1650] 3091 |
Nvidia | TU117 | 517,744 | 82,034 | 6.31 | 4 hrs 48 mins |
20 | GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile GP106M [GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile] |
Nvidia | GP106M | 362,721 | 71,004 | 5.11 | 5 hrs 42 mins |
21 | P106-090 GP106 [P106-090] |
Nvidia | GP106 | 293,966 | 66,796 | 4.40 | 5 hrs 27 mins |
22 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] 2138 |
Nvidia | GP107 | 288,384 | 67,435 | 4.28 | 6 hrs 37 mins |
23 | RX 470/480/570/580/590 Ellesmere XT [RX 470/480/570/580/590] |
Ellesmere XT | 172,160 | 51,396 | 3.35 | 7 hrs 10 mins | |
24 | Quadro P1000 GP107GL [Quadro P1000] |
Nvidia | GP107GL | 171,285 | 55,333 | 3.10 | 8 hrs 45 mins |
25 | RX Vega M GL Polaris 22 XL [RX Vega M GL] |
Polaris 22 XL | 124,044 | 49,935 | 2.48 | 10 hrs 40 mins | |
26 | Quadro K1200 GM107GL [Quadro K1200] |
Nvidia | GM107GL | 60,175 | 39,296 | 1.53 | 16 hrs 40 mins |
PROJECT FOLDING PPD AVERAGES BY CPU BETA
PPDDB data as of Saturday, 28 January 2023 00:14:36
Rank Project |
CPU Model |
Logical Processors (LP) |
PPD-PLP AVG PPD per 1 LP |
ALL LP-PPD (Estimated) |
Make |
---|